PREEMPT* pivotal trial results

PROVEN prevention in Chronic Migraine with significant headache (HA) day reductions1-3

8 to 9 fewer headache days per month from baseline at primary time point of 24 weeks (vs 6 to 7 with placebo)1-3

Efficacy headache reduction chart
  • 8 to 9 fewer migraine/probable migraine days per month at 24 weeks (vs 6 to 7 with placebo) (secondary endpoint)1-3

*PREEMPT = Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy.

Study design: PREEMPT 1 and 2 were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (N = 1384) across 122 sites. Subjects included adult Chronic Migraine patients not using any concurrent headache prophylaxis and, during a 28-day baseline period, had ≥ 15 headache days lasting 4 hours or more, with ≥ 50% being migraine/probable migraine. Patients were allowed to use acute headache treatments during the study. Primary time point was 24 weeks. A headache day was defined as a calendar day per 28 days with ≥ 4 continuous hours of headache.1,3

Established safety profile1

MOST FREQUENTLY REPORTED ADVERSE REACTION BOTOX® (n = 687) PLACEBO (n = 692)
Neck pain 9% 3%
Headache 5% 3%
Eyelid ptosis 4% < 1%
Migraine 4% 3%
Muscular weakness 4% < 1%
Musculoskeletal stiffness 4% 1%
Bronchitis 3% 1%
Injection-site pain 3% 2%
Musculoskeletal pain 3% 1%
Myalgia 3% 1%
Facial paresis 2% 0%
Hypertension 2% 1%
Muscle spasms 2% 1%
  • 4% of BOTOX® patients discontinued pivotal trials due to adverse events (vs 1% for placebo)1
  • Observed treatment-related adverse events were typically mild to moderate in severity2

*PREEMPT = Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy.

This does not cover all the possible serious side effects of BOTOX®. Please see the Important Safety Information, including Boxed Warning, and the full Prescribing Information and Medication Guide.

RESULTS FROM THE FORWARD OPEN-LABEL STUDY

Evaluating Effectiveness of BOTOX® Compared to Topiramate for Headache Prevention in Adults With Chronic Migraine

Effectiveness is used to assess clinical utility of treatment under real-world conditions, and accounts for efficacy and tolerability.4

Study Design4

  • US multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, prospective study designed to reflect real-world clinical practice
  • Compared the effectiveness of BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxinA) and topiramate in preventive treatment of Chronic Migraine via a pragmatic design and, therefore, explored the clinical utility of each treatment
  • The study consisted of a pre-treatment period lasting 4 weeks, a treatment period with BOTOX® or topiramate treatment lasting up to 36 weeks, and a post-treatment follow-up period lasting 12 weeks (for patients receiving BOTOX®)

Patients discontinuing treatment with topiramate could cross over to BOTOX® treatment at week 12, 24, or 36.4

Primary Endpoint4

  • The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in headache days§ (at 32 weeks)ll
  • After 12 weeks, patients initially randomized to topiramate could cross over to treatment with BOTOX®

Study Interventions4

  • BOTOX® 155 Units at day 1, week 12 ± 7 days, and week 24 ± 7 days, or
  • Topiramate titrated up to 50 to 100 mg/day until week 12, as tolerated with the resulting dose maintained for the remainder of the study
  • BOTOX® injections can occur at 11-13 weeks. The recommended retreatment schedule for BOTOX® is every 12 weeks
  • Topiramate doses varied according to tolerability
  • Patients discontinuing topiramate treatment for any reason on or before week 36 could cross over to receive BOTOX® treatment at their next scheduled study visit (ie, week 12, 24, or 36). For patients crossing over from topiramate to BOTOX®, the final exit visit was 12 weeks after the last BOTOX® treatment; patients who received BOTOX® treatment at week 36 had their final visit at week 48

Data Analysis4

  • The intention-to-treat population, including all randomized patients, was used to assess primary and secondary endpoints. Any patient receiving > 1 dose of study treatment was included in the safety population. A baseline observation carried forward imputation method was used to impute missing values for all primary and secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses for the primary outcome were undertaken using prorated observed data and modified last observation carried forward

§A headache day was defined as a calendar day with a headache of ≥ 4 hours’ duration and/or a headache of any duration if acute migraine medication was taken.4

llBased on the 28-day period between weeks 29 to 32.4

Limitations4

  • FORWARD was an open-label prospective study which was not blinded and not placebo controlled; hence, conclusions related to clinical efficacy or safety cannot be drawn from study results. Results should be interpreted with caution, as treatment expectations can bias results of subjects and investigators
  • The findings do not describe results from randomized, controlled, head-to-head clinical trials
  • Patients could receive BOTOX® during the topiramate taper period; therefore, it is possible that some portion of the efficacy results observed in the crossover group were due to topiramate
  • Possible bias introduced by awareness among patients who were randomized to topiramate that they could cross over to BOTOX®, but not vice versa. Patients switching from topiramate to BOTOX® could receive injections during the tapering period
  • Prospective, open-label study design allows for discontinuations to account for real-world clinical decisions and variability in adherence
  • Discontinuations were handled as baseline observation carried forward. No relationship between discontinuations and superiority, efficacy, or tolerability can be definitively concluded
  • Baseline observation carried forward imputation is designed to measure efficacy under the context of tolerability, (ie, effectiveness). It is assumed treatment that cannot be tolerated is unlikely to be effective but may conflate lack of effectiveness with tolerability. A modified last observation carried forward sensitivity analysis is suited for measuring efficacy

Selection of a treatment should be individualized for each patient based on full Prescribing Information and factors including, but not limited to, product efficacy, Important Safety Information, product safety, adverse events, dosage and administration, potential for drug interactions, patients’ test results, and comorbid conditions.

Key inclusion criteria4:

  • Adults (aged 18 to 65 years) with a diagnosis of Chronic Migraine per ICHD-3 beta​
  • ≥ 15 headache days in a 28-day period​

Key exclusion criteria4:

  • Previous use of botulinum toxin or topiramate for any reason​
  • Pregnancy
  • Significant risk of suicide, assessed using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale

Patients with Chronic Migraine were randomized to treatment with BOTOX® (n = 140) or topiramate (n = 142)4

% of patients who completed treatment through week 364

BOTOX®

% of patients who completed treatment up to 36 weeks
vs symbol

Topiramate

% of patients who completed treatment up to 36 weeks

Discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AEs)4

BOTOX®

Discontinuation rates due to adverse events
vs symbol

Topiramate

Discontinuation rates due to adverse events
  • Most common treatment-related AEs in patients receiving BOTOX® were neck pain (4%), musculoskeletal pain (2%), and migraine (1%)4
  • Most common treatment-related AEs in patients receiving topiramate were paresthesia (29%), cognitive disorder (12%), fatigue (12%), nausea (12%), decreased appetite (11%), dizziness (11%), and attention disturbance (8%)4

Limitations: The findings do not describe results from randomized, controlled, head-to-head clinical trials. Conclusions related to clinical efficacy or safety cannot be drawn from study results. There is possible bias introduced as patients who were randomized to topiramate were aware that they could cross over to BOTOX®, but not vice versa.

Selection of a treatment should be individualized for each patient based on full Prescribing Information and factors including, but not limited to, product efficacy, Important Safety Information, product safety, adverse events, dosage and administration, potential for drug interactions, patients’ test results, and comorbid conditions.

Effectiveness as measured by ≥ 50% responder rates at week 324,ll

Primary Endpoint: Proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in headache days from baseline at week 324,ll

proportion of reduction chart

Missing data imputed using baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) imputation method.

BOCF analysis reflects real-world practice and clinical utility of the treatment when using the analysis that accounts for the treatment discontinuation.

llBased on the 28-day period between weeks 29 to 32.4

Sensitivity Analysis4:

  • The modified last observation carried forward (mLOCF) imputation data demonstrated that 75 (53.6%) patients treated with BOTOX® and 72 (50.7%) topiramate-treated patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in headache frequency at 32 weeksll
  • There was no significant between-group difference
  • mLOCF analysis is aligned with how efficacy is measured in randomized, controlled, clinical trials and is reflective of treatment efficacy when the patient stays on treatment

Limitations: The findings do not describe results from randomized, controlled, head-to-head clinical trials. Conclusions related to clinical efficacy or safety cannot be drawn from study results. There is possible bias introduced as patients who were randomized to topiramate were aware that they could cross over to BOTOX®, but not vice versa.4

Study Design: This study compared the effectiveness of BOTOX® 155 Units and topiramate at doses up to 50 to 100 mg for the preventive treatment of Chronic Migraine in adults via a pragmatic design that explored the clinical utility of each treatment. After 12 weeks, patients initially randomized to topiramate could cross over to treatment with BOTOX® at week 12, 24, or 36.4

Selection of a treatment should be individualized for each patient based on full Prescribing Information and factors including, but not limited to, product efficacy, Important Safety Information, product safety, adverse events, dosage and administration, potential for drug interactions, patients’ test results, and comorbid conditions.

Why wait? Talk to your appropriate Chronic Migraine patients about BOTOX® today